Case Details

  • Case Name: Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 18198/2026
  • Parties: Haridwar Highways Project Limited (Petitioner) vs Era Infra Engineering Limited & ANR (Respondents)
  • Court/Authority: Supreme Court of India, Court No.6, Item No.64, Section XIV
  • Order Date: 25‑05‑2026
  • Originating Judgment: Impugned final judgment and order dated 23‑03‑2026 in ARB.A.(COMM.) No. 47/2025 passed by the High Court of Delhi
  • Interim Applications (IA): IA No. 157696/2026 – exemption from filing C/C of the impugned judgment; IA No. 157706/2026 – permission to file additional documents/facts/annexures; IA No. 162009/2026 – permission to file additional documents/facts/annexures

Parties Involved

  • Petitioner: Haridwar Highways Project Limited
  • Counsel: Mr. Shyam Divan, Sr. Adv.; Mr. Ritin Rai, Sr. Adv.; Ms. Sushmita Gandhi, Adv.; Mr. Mohit Rohatgi, Adv.; Ms. Sanaya Patel, Adv.; Ms. Samriddhi Shukla, Adv.; Mr. Karan Trehan, Adv.; Ms. Kritika Garg, Adv.; Ms. Aditi Nemakal, Adv.; Ms. Ankita Gupta, Adv.; Ms. Nayanika Singhal, Adv.; Mr. Yashvardhan Singh, Adv.; Mr. Ankur Singhal, Adv.; Mr. Nitin Saluja, Adv.; AOR Mr. Gaurav Vardhan, Adv.; Ms. Pranya Madan, Adv.
  • Respondents: Era Infra Engineering Limited & ANR
  • Counsel: Mr. Sanjay Jain, Sr. Adv.; Mr. Santosh Kumar – I, AOR; Ms. Dharitry Phookan, Adv.; Mr. Siddharth Mehta, Adv.; Mr. Ritik Dwivedi, Adv.; Ms. Harshita Sukhija, Adv.; Additional counsel listed include Mr. Akash Kishore, Adv.; Mr. Mukul Rohatgi, Sr. Adv.; Mr. Gourab Banerjee, Sr. Adv.; Mr. Dhruv Mehta, Sr. Adv.; Mr. Rushil Anand, Adv.; Mr. Manthan Dixit, Adv.; Ms. Mallika Luthra, Adv.; Ms. Ayushi Goyal, Adv.; Ms. Mansi, Adv.; Mr. Rakesh Talukdar, Adv.; Ms. Upasana Mukherjee, Adv.; Mr. Anubhav Ray, Adv.; Ms. Shruti Munjal, Adv.

Issues / Allegations / Violations

  • The order does not specify substantive issues or allegations; it addresses procedural matters concerning the listing and bench composition for the appeal.

Findings & Observations

  • No substantive findings or legal reasoning are provided in this procedural order.

Penalties / Settlements / Directions

  • Direction 1: The matter shall be placed before a bench of the Supreme Court that does not include Justice P.S. Narasimha.
  • Direction 2: The Registry is instructed to place the matter before the Chief Justice for listing before the Partial Court Working Days.

Corrective Actions & Future Obligations

  • No corrective actions beyond the procedural directions are mandated.

Final Ruling & Enforcement

  • The Court’s procedural order is effective immediately, requiring the Registry to re‑assign the case to an appropriate bench and to schedule it for hearing before the Chief Justice under the Partial Court Working Days regime.