Case name: Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No. 18873/2026
Parties: M. Manonmani (Petitioner) vs Canara Bank (Respondent)
Court: Supreme Court of India
Order/Hearing Date: 29‑05‑2026 (hearing); Order signed 01‑06‑2026 16:45:09 IST
Related prior orders: Impugned final judgment and order dated 15‑05‑2026 in IA No. 433/2026 of Debts Recovery Tribunal‑III, Chennai; IA No. 164542/2026 (exemption from filing certified copy)
Period of dispute: Not specified; property status‑quo maintained till next hearing.
Parties Involved
Petitioner: M. Manonmani (also spelled M. Manoninani)
Respondent: Canara Bank
Petitioner's counsel: Mr. K. S. Mahadevan (Advocate), Ms. Swati Bansal (Advocate), Mr. R. Rangarajan (Advocate), Mr. Aravind Gopinathan (Advocate), Mr. Rajesh Kumar (Advocate, AOR)
Petition sought exemption from filing a certified copy of the impugned judgment issued by the Debts Recovery Tribunal‑III, Chennai.
No other substantive allegations or violations were raised.
Findings & Observations
The Supreme Court, after hearing counsel, allowed the application for exemption from filing the certified copy.
Penalties / Settlements / Directions
Exemption from filing the certified copy of the impugned judgment was granted.
The Court directed issuance of notice and tagging with SLP(C) No. 24189/2019 titled “M/s. Emayam Enterprises and Ors vs. Central Bank of India and Ors.”
Notice to be served by all modes, including dasti.
Status‑quo concerning the disputed property shall be maintained until the next hearing.
Corrective Actions & Future Obligations
Serve the notice as directed, using all prescribed modes.
Maintain the status‑quo on the property pending further proceedings.
Final Ruling & Enforcement
Application for exemption approved.
Directions on notice issuance and property status‑quo are enforceable, with compliance to be monitored at the subsequent hearing.
