Authority: High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad
Order Date: 31 July 2026
Case Overview
- Parties: Petitioner Adinath Salt LLP; Respondents Paschim Gujarat Vij Company Limited (PGVCL) and an unnamed second respondent.
- Petition sought a court direction to provide/restore electricity connection to the petitioner’s property.
- Respondent initially refused connection because the petitioner had not paid the required security deposit and other transfer charges.
- Petitioner later indicated willingness to pay the security deposit and all applicable charges for the transfer.
- Respondent, through counsel citing instructions from Executive Engineer S. K. Khunt, agreed to process the transfer upon receipt of a fresh application and payment of the requisite fees.
Final Outcome
- The Court granted the petitioner’s request to file a fresh application and did not press the present petition, disposing it as “not pressed” without addressing the merits of the dispute.
Topics: Electricity Connection, Legal Relief