Case Details

  • Case Name: Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 18630‑18631/2026
  • Parties: M/S ALAG PROPERTY CONSTRUCTIONS PVT LTD (through its director) – Petitioner; THE MULUND ENDEAVOUR CO‑OP. HOUSING SOCIETY PVT. LTD & ORS – Respondents
  • Court/Authority: Supreme Court of India
  • Order/Case No.: Not specified (order dated 25‑05‑2026)
  • Date of Order: 25‑05‑2026 (hearing date); reference to High Court judgment dated 17‑04‑2026
  • Period of Dispute/Violation: Not expressly stated; dispute arises from High Court judgment dated 17‑04‑2026 and subsequent arbitral order dated 23‑05‑2026

Parties Involved

  • Petitioner: M/S ALAG PROPERTY CONSTRUCTIONS PVT LTD, represented by its director (name not disclosed)
  • Respondents: THE MULUND ENDEAVOUR CO‑OP. HOUSING SOCIETY PVT. LTD & others
  • Counsel for Petitioner: Senior Counsel Mr. Siddharth Bhatnagar, Mr. Anand Dilip Landge (AOR), Mr. Bhavik Lalan, Mr. Sanjay Shinde, Mr. Aditya Sidhra
  • Counsel for Respondents: Not listed
  • Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Aradhe
  • Registrar: (JAYANT KUMAR ARORA) (NIDHI WASON) ASTT. REGISTRAR‑cum‑PS ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

Issues / Allegations / Violations

  • Petitioners sought Special Leave to Appeal against the impugned final judgment and order dated 17‑04‑2026 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay (CAL No. 12844/2026, IA(L) No. 13012/2026).
  • The petition also references an Arbitral Tribunal order issued under Section 17 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act on 23‑05‑2026, digitally signed by Jayant Kumar Arora.
  • The core allegation is that the High Court’s order should be set aside or modified; the petitioners also contest the arbitral order’s legality.

Findings & Observations

  • The Supreme Court observed that it is not inclined to interfere with the impugned High Court order.
  • The Court noted the existence of the arbitral tribunal’s order dated 23‑05‑2026 and acknowledged that the petitioner is entitled to file an appeal against that arbitral order.
  • The Court indicated it will consider the legality and validity of the arbitral order on its own merits when the appeal is filed.

Penalties / Settlements / Directions

  • No monetary penalties or settlements were imposed.
  • The Special Leave Petitions (SLPs) stand dismissed.
  • Any pending interlocutory applications, if any, were disposed of.

Corrective Actions & Future Obligations

  • The petitioner may file a separate appeal against the arbitral tribunal’s order dated 23‑05‑2026.
  • The Supreme Court will evaluate the legality and validity of that arbitral order when the appeal is presented.

Final Ruling & Enforcement

  • The Supreme Court dismissed the Special Leave Petitions, thereby leaving the High Court’s judgment dated 17‑04‑2026 intact.
  • All interlocutory applications, if any, were disposed of.
  • The matter proceeds to the next stage where the petitioner can appeal the arbitral tribunal’s order, subject to the Court’s future consideration of its merits.