Case name: Ambience Projects and Infrastructure Private Limited vs Sammaan Capital Limited (Special Leave to Appeal (C) No. 18347‑18348/2026; also SLP(C) No. 18350‑18351/2026 (XIV)).
Court/Authority: Supreme Court of India.
Judges: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aravind Kumar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Prasanna B. Varale.
Hearing date: 21‑05‑2026.
Related arbitration: ARB.P No. 1501/2024, DIAC No. 10367/2/2025; final judgment and order dated 12‑02‑2025.
Interim Applications (IA): IA No. 115594/2026, IA No. 115595/2026 (condonation of delay & exemption from filing C/C of impugned judgment); IA No. 115641/2026, IA No. 115643/2026 (similar relief).
Parties Involved
Petitioner: Ambience Projects and Infrastructure Private Limited.
Respondent: Sammaan Capital Limited (formerly Indiabulls Housing Finance Limited).
Respondent’s counsel: Sr. Adv. Rakesh Dwivedi, Dr. A. M. Singhvi (Sr. Adv.), Sr. Adv. Nalin Kohli, Sr. Adv. Dama S. Seshadri, Sr. Adv. Mahesh Agarwal, among others.
Issues / Allegations / Violations
The petition challenges the final judgment and order dated 12‑02‑2025 passed by the Delhi International Arbitration Centre (DIAC) in arbitration proceeding ARB.P No. 1501/2024 / DIAC No. 10367/2/2025.
Specific grounds of challenge, alleged breaches, or violations are not detailed in the order excerpt.
Findings & Observations
The Court, after hearing counsel, issued procedural directions; no substantive findings on the merits of the arbitration award are recorded in this order.
Penalties / Settlements / Directions
The matter is listed for further hearing on 20‑07‑2026.
Both parties are at liberty to make a joint request before the learned mediator for accommodation to postpone the pronouncement of the final award.
The arbitral tribunal is empowered to hear arguments if it deems fit, at its discretion.
Corrective Actions & Future Obligations
Parties may jointly approach the mediator to seek postponement of the award pronouncement.
Any further arguments may be presented before the arbitral tribunal as per its discretion.
Final Ruling & Enforcement
No final decision on the merits of the dispute was rendered; the Court issued only procedural orders as outlined above.