APL Apollo Tubes Appeal Adjourned by Supreme Court

Case Name: Civil Appeal No(s). 1581/2018
Parties: M/S APL Apollo Tubes Ltd (Appellant) vs Deputy Commissioner Commercial Tax & ANR (Respondent)
Court/Authority: Supreme Court of India
Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aravind Kumar, Hon'ble Mr. Justice S.V.N. Bhatti
Case/Order No.: IA No. 93928/2022 (Clarification), IA No. 86629/2022 (Early Hearing Application), IA No. 217822/2023 (Intervention Application)
Date of Order: 21-05-2026

Appellant: APL Apollo Tubes Ltd
Counsel for Appellant: Mr. Deepak Goel (Advocate on Record)
Respondent: Deputy Commissioner Commercial Tax & ANR
Counsel for Respondent: Mr. Dinesh Dwivedi (Senior Advocate), Mr. Bhakti Vardhan Singh (AOR), Mr. J Tarun Kumar (Advocate), Mr. Narendra Kumar Pandey (Advocate), Mr. Ankit Khatri (Advocate), Mr. Nishant Singh (Advocate), Mr. Ajay Aggarwal (Advocate), Mr. Adarsh Aggarwal (Advocate), Mr. Rajan Narain (AOR), Mr. Nishit Agrawal (AOR), Ms. Kanishka Mittal (Advocate), Ms. Deepti Rathi (Advocate)

The specific substantive issues or allegations underlying the appeal are not detailed in the order excerpt.
The proceedings involve a commercial tax dispute between APL Apollo Tubes Ltd and the Deputy Commissioner Commercial Tax.

No substantive findings or legal reasoning are provided in the order; the court addressed procedural matters only.

1. No appearance was made on behalf of the appellant.

2. The matter is to be listed after the partial court working days.

3. The matter shall retain its current position in the court docket.

The appellant must ensure representation in future hearings to avoid further procedural adjournments.
The case will proceed after the stipulated partial court working days as per the court's scheduling order.

The Supreme Court has adjourned the matter, directing it to be listed post‑partial court working days while maintaining its docket position.
No further enforcement actions are indicated in this order.