Case Details

  • Case Name: M/S ARPANAS ENTREE PVT. LTD & ORS. vs RUCHI RAJIV JANI
  • Petition: Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 19292/2026
  • Court/Authority: Supreme Court of India, Partial Court Working Days Bench
  • Justices: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Karol, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Augustine George Masih
  • Order/Case No.: Impugned judgment and order dated 04-05-2026 in RFA No.1997/2026 (High Court of Gujarat, Ahmedabad)
  • Date of Hearing: 01-06-2026
  • Period of Dispute: Not specified (challenge to High Court judgment dated 04-05-2026)

Parties Involved

  • Petitioners: M/S ARPANAS ENTREE PVT. LTD & ORS.
  • Respondent: RUCHI RAJIV JANI
  • Counsel for Petitioners: Mr. Ankit Borker, Adv.; Mr. Rahul Pansari, Adv.; Ms. Sneha Pansari, Adv.; Mr. Anchal Kumar Matre, Adv.; Mr. Alok Singh, Adv.; Mr. Vinay Aherodia, Adv.; Mr. Sameer Malik, Adv.; Mr. B M Singh, Adv.; Mr. Santosh Dohre, Adv.; Mr. Sandeep Kumar Singh, Adv.; Ms. Shivangi Singh, Adv.; Mr. Raj Shekhar Sharma, Adv.; Ms. Alpana Sharma, AOR
  • Counsel for Respondent: Not listed

Issues / Allegations / Violations

  • Petitioners challenge the final judgment and order dated 04‑05‑2026 passed by the High Court of Gujarat in RFA No.1997/2026.
  • Specific allegations or grounds of challenge are not detailed in the excerpt.

Findings & Observations

  • The Supreme Court bench did not provide detailed findings in the order excerpt; it proceeded to issue procedural directions.

Penalties / Settlements / Directions

  • Notice Issuance: The Court ordered that a notice be issued, returnable on 31‑07‑2026.
  • Service Method: Dasti service is permitted; steps for service must be taken within one week of the order.
  • Respondent Obligations: The notice must state that the respondent is required to file a counter‑affidavit and reply to any interlocutory applications before the next date of listing.

Corrective Actions & Future Obligations

  • Petitioners must ensure service of the notice via Dasti within the stipulated one‑week period.
  • Respondent must prepare and file a counter‑affidavit and any required replies before the subsequent listing date as directed.

Final Ruling & Enforcement

  • The Court’s order is procedural, directing issuance of notice, permitting Dasti service, and setting timelines for service and respondent’s filing of counter‑affidavit/reply.
  • No substantive judgment on the merits of the petition is provided in this excerpt; further proceedings will follow based on compliance with the directions.