Case Name: Assistant Commissioner of Central Tax and Central Excise vs M/s Sahiti Agencies
Petition: Special Leave Petition (C) No. 6232/2026 (SLP(C) No. 10606‑10607/2026)
Court/Authority: Supreme Court of India, Registrar Court (Section XII‑A)
Registrar: Sh. Apurv Singh
Date of Order: 04‑06‑2026
Period of Dispute/Violation: Not specified in the order
Parties Involved
Petitioner: Assistant Commissioner of Central Tax and Central Excise
Counsel: Mr. Kedar Nath Tripathy (Advocate‑on‑Record), Mr. Gurmeet Singh Makker (Advocate‑on‑Record)
Respondent: M/s Sahiti Agencies
Counsel: Ms. Medha Sinha (Advocate), Mr. Atrey Gc (Advocate), Ms. Charanya Lakshmikumaran (Advocate‑on‑Record), Mr. Swastik Mishra (Advocate)
Registrar: Sh. Apurv Singh
Issues / Allegations / Violations
The petitioner did not file the required spare copies for issuance of notice to the respondents as mandated by the Court’s order dated 20.05.2026.
Non‑compliance with procedural directions concerning notice issuance.
Findings & Observations
The Court observed that the petitioner’s counsel had not complied with the earlier order to file spare copies.
The Court granted a final opportunity to the petitioner to comply, emphasizing the importance of adhering to procedural requirements.
Penalties / Settlements / Directions
The petitioner is directed to file the spare copies within one week from the date of this order (i.e., by 11‑06‑2026).
If the spare copies are filed within the stipulated period, the Court will issue the notice immediately and list the matter for hearing on 07‑08‑2026.
If the petitioner fails to file the spare copies within the deadline, the Registry is instructed to list the matter before the Hon’ble Judge in Chambers for further directions.
Corrective Actions & Future Obligations
The petitioner must ensure the spare copies are digitally signed and submitted to the Registry within the one‑week timeframe.
Upon receipt, the Registry will issue the notice to the respondents and schedule the hearing as directed.
Final Ruling & Enforcement
The order is a procedural directive; compliance is mandatory for the continuation of the case.
Failure to comply will result in the matter being taken up by a Judge in Chambers, potentially leading to further procedural or substantive orders.
