Case Name: COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS (PORT) vs M/S. BAGRECHA ENTERPRISES LIMITED
Civil Appeal Nos.: 12668‑12670/2025
Diary No.: 20910/2026 (listed on 27‑05‑2026)
Interlocutory Applications: IA No. 156709/2024 (exemption from filing C/C of the impugned judgment), IA No. 127940/2026 (condonation of delay in filing)
Service of notice on the sole respondent completed on 19‑05‑2026
Parties Involved
Appellant: Commissioner of Customs (Port)
Respondent: M/s. Bagrecha Enterprises Limited
Registrar: Sh. Apurv Singh (Registrar, Supreme Court of India)
Advocates for Appellant: Mr. Bhagwan Jee Thakur, Adv.; Mr. Gurmeet Singh Makker, AOR
Advocates for Respondent: Mr. Anant Gautam, AOR; Mr. Kartik Jindal, Adv.; Mr. Vibhu Sharma, Adv.; Ms. Likivi Jakhalu, Adv.; Mr. Aman Gahlot, Adv.; Mr. Rishi Chauhan, Adv.; Ms. Azal Aekram, Adv.; Mr. Sunny Sachin Rawat, Adv.; Mr. Hari Radhakrishnan, Adv.; Mr. Sethu Prabhaharan, Adv.; Mr. Sudarshan Singh Rawat, AOR
Issues / Allegations / Violations
The respondent had not filed a counter‑affidavit despite service of notice on 19‑05‑2026.
Applications were filed seeking exemption from filing a copy/counter‑affidavit of the impugned judgment and condonation of delay.
Findings & Observations
The Registrar observed that service was complete but the counter‑affidavit remained pending.
No substantive merits of the applications were addressed; the focus was procedural compliance.
Penalties / Settlements / Directions
The Registrar directed that the respondent must file the counter‑affidavit within 30 days from the date of service (i.e., by 18‑06‑2026).
No monetary penalty was imposed.
Corrective Actions & Future Obligations
The respondent is required to submit the counter‑affidavit within the stipulated period.
After the 30‑day window expires, the Registry will process the matter for listing before the Hon'ble Court as per the applicable rules.
A copy of this order is to be furnished to the concerned Advocate‑on‑Record for information and compliance.
Final Ruling & Enforcement
The order is enforceable immediately; failure to comply may result in the matter being listed for further hearing without the counter‑affidavit.
The Registrar’s directive constitutes the final procedural order for this listing.