Case Name: Bajaj Auto Ltd. vs. Santosh Chandrakant Potdar
Petition: Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s).19902‑19903/2026
Origin: Impugned final judgment and order dated 30‑04‑2026 in WP No.15252/2024 and WP No.8711/2024 of the High Court of Judicature at Bombay
Court/Authority: Supreme Court of India
Date of Hearing: 08‑06‑2026
Order/Case No.: Not specified (order signed on 09‑06‑2026)
Parties Involved
Petitioner: Bajaj Auto Limited
Respondent: Santosh Chandrakant Potdar
Counsel for Petitioner: Mr. J.P. Cama (Senior Advocate), Ms. Pritha Srikumar Iyer, Mr. Arun Sri Kumar, Ms. Mansi Binjrajka, AOR Mr. Ritwik Gupta, Ms. Anwesha Singh
Counsel for Respondent: Ms. Jane Cox, Mr. Ghanashyam Thombare, Mr. Sudipto Sircar, AOR
Court Master: Akshay Kumar Bhoria (MINI)
Issues / Allegations / Violations
Petition seeks special leave to appeal against the High Court judgments dated 30‑04‑2026.
Requests exemption from filing O.T. IA No.176202/2026 and permission to file additional documents, facts, and annexures (IA No.171324/2026).
Prayer for interim relief was made by the petitioner.
Findings & Observations
The order does not provide detailed findings or legal reasoning; it proceeds directly to procedural directions.
Penalties / Settlements / Directions
Interim Relief: Prayer for interim relief rejected.
Procedural Direction: Court ordered that a notice be issued, which is returnable within eight weeks.
Corrective Actions & Future Obligations
The petitioner must comply with the notice and respond within the eight‑week period as directed by the Court.
No further immediate obligations are stipulated beyond the notice return.
Final Ruling & Enforcement
The Supreme Court rejected the interim relief sought by Bajaj Auto Ltd.
The matter is to proceed with the issuance of a notice, returnable in eight weeks.
The order was digitally signed by the Court Master on 09‑06‑2026 at 17:36:13 IST (Signature not verified).
