Authority: Supreme Court of India
Order Date: 05-08-2026 (digital signature timestamp)
Case Overview
- Petition: Bank of Baroda (Petitioner) filed Special Leave Petition (Civil) Diary No. 38008/2026, arising from impugned final judgment and order dated 29‑04‑2024 in WPL No. 35148/2022 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay.
- Respondents: Jiteshbhai Bhagwanbhai Kajavadra & Ors.
- Counsel for petitioner: Ms. Praveena Gautam (AOR), Ms. Tissy Annie Thomas, Adv. Mr. Pawan Shukla, Adv. Mr. Rohan Bansla.
- Bench: Hon’ble Mrs. Justice B.V. Nagarathna and Hon’ble Mr. Justice R. Mahadevan.
- Issue: Application seeking condonation of delay in filing and the SLP itself.
Order Details
- The Court directed that notice be issued to the respondents on both the application for condonation of delay and the Special Leave Petition.
- Pending consideration of the SLP, the private respondents/writ petitioners must seek permission from the High Court if they intend to travel abroad.
- The Court observed that if such an application is filed before the High Court in the disposed writ petitions, it shall be considered expeditiously.
- The pendency of the SLP before the Supreme Court will not prevent the petitioner from formulating a fresh Office Memorandum, should it be found necessary.
- The matter is tagged with SLP(C) No. 13305 of 2026 and connected matters.
Final Outcome
- Notice to be issued to respondents on the delay‑condonation application and the SLP; interim travel permission requirement imposed; petitioner retains ability to issue a new Office Memorandum irrespective of SLP pendency.
Topics: Legal Procedure, Banking