Authority: Supreme Court of India

Order Date: 18-09-2026

Case Overview

  • Petitioners: M/s Bee Gee Builtch & Anr.
  • Respondents: Jatinder Pal Singh & Anr.
  • SLP Nos.: 16008‑16012/2023 arising from NCDRC final judgment and order dated 12‑05‑2023 in FA Nos. 2442/2017 to 2446/2017.
  • Counsel for Petitioners: Ms. Sweta Rani (AOR), Ms. Debasmita Dutta, Adv., Mr. Tushar Swami, Adv.
  • Counsel for Respondents: Mr. Salil Sagar, Sr. Adv., Mr. Sankalp Sagar, Adv., Ms. Mithu Jain (AOR), Mr. Shashwat Jaiswal (AOR), Ms. Diksha Arora, Adv.
  • Bench: Hon'ble Mrs. Justice B.V. Nagarathna and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Augustine George Masih.

Observations & Reasoning

  • The Court examined the material on record, including the impugned NCDRC order.
  • It found no reason to interfere with the directions issued by the NCDRC in paragraph 8 of the impugned order.
  • Consequently, the Special Leave Petitions were dismissed.
  • The Registry’s objections to the petitioners’ application for substitution were overruled.
  • The application for substitution was allowed, and petitioners were directed to file an amended memo of parties.
  • Any pending applications, if any, were ordered to stand disposed of.

Final Outcome

  • All Special Leave Petitions (SLP Nos. 16008‑16012/2023) are dismissed.
  • Substitution application is permitted; petitioners must file an amended memo of parties.
  • All pending applications, if any, are to be considered disposed.

Topics: Consumer Disputes, Supreme Court Judgment, Legal Procedure