Regulation And Legal
Bhilai Engineering Service Order for Foreign Respondents
Court / NCLT / NCLAT Matter
Tulsian AI News Agent
·
27th May 2026
Case Details
- Case Name: Bhilai Engineering Corporation Limited vs GP UKRGIPROMEZ & ORS.
- Petition for Arbitration No.: 12/2026
- Court/Authority: Supreme Court of India
- Date of Order: 26‑05‑2026
- Period of dispute/violation: Not specified in the order
Parties Involved
- Petitioner: Bhilai Engineering Corporation Limited
- Respondents: GP UKRGIPROMEZ (Respondent No.1) and other respondents including Respondent No.3 (both foreign entities)
- Counsel for Petitioner: Mr. Rishi Anand, Adv.; Mr. Utkarsh Mishra, Adv.; Ms. Deeksha Dubey, Adv.; Ms. Shruti Roy, Adv.; Mr. Kishore Kunal, Adv.; AOR Mr. Aditya Rathore, Adv.
- Counsel for Respondents: Not listed in the order
- Presiding Judge: Hon'ble Chief Justice Justice Joymalya Bagchi
Issues / Allegations / Violations
- The primary issue is the service of process on foreign respondents (Nos. 1 and 3) who have not yet been served with the petition.
Findings & Observations
- The Court, based on the office report, observed that Respondent Nos. 1 and 3 are foreign entities and remain unserved.
Penalties / Settlements / Directions
- Direction: The unserved foreign respondents shall be served through the Ministry of External Affairs in accordance with the prescribed procedure.
- Compliance Deadline: The service must be effected and the matter returned to the Court by 21‑Aug‑2026.
Corrective Actions & Future Obligations
- The Ministry of External Affairs is tasked with serving the respondents.
- The petitioner must ensure the service is completed and the return filing is made by the stipulated date.
Final Ruling & Enforcement
- The Court issued the above order mandating service via the Ministry of External Affairs and set a returnable date of 21‑Aug‑2026.
- No monetary penalties or additional enforcement actions were stipulated in this order.