Authority: High Court of Himachal Pradesh at Shimla

Order Date: 10 July 2026

Case Overview

  • Petitioner: Blue Lotus Residences
  • Respondents: Rajesh Agrawal & Ors.
  • Counsel for Petitioner: Mr. Amrit, Advocate and Mr. Sanjeev Sood, Advocate.
  • Counsel for Respondents: Mr. Balram Sharma, Deputy Solicitor General of India with Mr. Rajeev Sharma, Advocate (for respondents No.1 & 2); Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General (for respondents No.3 & 4).
  • The Deputy Solicitor General placed on record a communication dated 15 May 2026 stating that, after examination under Clause 7.3 of the Scheme, the Committee considered the unit not prima facie eligible for consideration and, in the absence of any budgetary allocation, the application could not be deemed eligible.

Final Outcome

  • The Court held that no further order was required in the contempt petition and consequently closed and disposed of the petition.
  • The Court directed that, should the petitioner remain aggrieved, it is at liberty to avail the appropriate remedy available under law.

Topics: Contempt Petition, Judicial Decision