Authority: High Court of Judicature at Bombay

Order Date: October 9, 2026

Case Overview

  • Petitioner: Aditya Birla Capital Limited, represented by Mr. Gaurav Jain, Advocate, Indialaw LLP.
  • Respondent: Supreet Kumar, represented by Mr. Moksh Jain, Advocate, Wadhwa & Co.
  • Arbitration Petition No. 451 of 2026 filed in the Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction of the Bombay High Court.
  • The petition sought reliefs, including a specific relief under prayer clause (b), due to the Respondent's non‑compliance with a court‑directed disclosure requirement.

Final Outcome

  • The Court, presided over by Justice Amit Borkar, observed that the Respondent failed to file the required disclosure as directed.
  • Accordingly, the Court held that the Petitioner had made out a case for the grant of relief under prayer clause (b).
  • Regarding any other reliefs, the Court directed that the Petitioner may approach the Arbitral Tribunal for further relief.
  • The petition was disposed of by the Court.

Topics: Arbitration, Corporate Litigation