Case Details

  • Case name: Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s).24416/2023
  • Parties: Chhattisgarh State Civil Supplies Corporation Limited & Ors. (Petitioner) vs AVI India International LLP (Respondent)
  • Court/Authority: Supreme Court of India
  • Order reference: ITEM NO.83 COURT NO.7 SECTION IV-C
  • Date of Order: 27‑05‑2026
  • Origin: Impugned final judgment and order dated 20‑07‑2023 in ARBA No. 18/2022 passed by the High Court of Chhattisgarh at Bilaspur

Parties Involved

  • Petitioners: Chhattisgarh State Civil Supplies Corporation Limited, other associated parties
  • Respondent: AVI India International LLP
  • Counsel for Petitioners: Mr. Sumeer Sodhi (Advocate), Mr. Adiraj Bali (Advocate on Record)
  • Counsel for Respondent: Mr. Ashutosh Ghade (Advocate on Record)
  • Bench: Hon’ble Mr. Justice J.B. Pardiwala, Hon’ble Mr. Justice K.V. Viswanathan
  • Appointed Arbitrator: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Arvind Singh Chandel (former Judge of Chhattisgarh High Court and Patna High Court)

Issues / Allegations / Violations

  • The order does not detail the substantive issues; it merely refers to the dispute arising from the High Court judgment dated 20‑07‑2023.

Findings & Observations

  • No substantive findings are recorded in the order; the Court directs the parties to resolve the matter through arbitration.

Penalties / Settlements / Directions

  • Parties are directed to proceed to arbitration.
  • Hon’ble Mr. Justice Arvind Singh Chandel is appointed as arbitrator.
  • Fees of the arbitrator and procedural modalities to be fixed after consultation with parties.
  • Parties must contact the arbitrator promptly.
  • Registry to inform the arbitrator of this order at the earliest.
  • The matter will be listed again after receipt of the arbitrator’s report.

Corrective Actions & Future Obligations

  • Parties must engage with the appointed arbitrator and agree on fee structure.
  • Compliance with the arbitration process as directed by the Court.
  • Subsequent listing of the case contingent upon receipt of the arbitrator’s report.

Final Ruling & Enforcement

  • The Supreme Court’s order mandates arbitration as the mode of dispute resolution and appoints a former High Court judge as arbitrator, with procedural steps outlined for fee determination, communication, and future listing.