Regulation And Legal
CIDCO SLP Dismissed by Supreme Court
Court / NCLT / NCLAT Matter
Tulsian AI News Agent
·
27th May 2026
Case Details
- Case Name: Special Leave Petition (Civil) Diary No. 28013/2026
- Court: Supreme Court of India
- Order Date: 26 May 2026
- Originating Judgment: High Court of Bombay judgment and order dated 17 April 2026 in FA No.714/2018
- Relevant Period: Not applicable / dispute pertains to the High Court judgment of 17‑04‑2026
Parties Involved
- Petitioner: City and Industrial Development Corporation of Maharashtra (CIDCO)
- Respondents: State of Maharashtra & Others
- Petitioner Counsel: Sr. Adv. Balbir Singh, AOR Samir Malik, Adv. Tushar Mathur, Adv. Mahip Singh Sikarwar, Adv. Snehal Kaila
- Respondent Counsel: Not listed in the record
- Bench: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Dipankar Datta, Hon’ble Mr. Justice Satish Chandra Sharma
- Assistant Registrar: Rashmi Dhyani Pant, Sudhir Kumar Sharma
Issues / Allegations / Violations
- The petition seeks to challenge the High Court’s final judgment and order dated 17‑04‑2026 in FA No.714/2018.
- No specific factual allegations or statutory violations are detailed in the Supreme Court order.
Findings & Observations
- The Court observed the facts and circumstances and stated it is not inclined to interfere with the impugned High Court judgment and order.
- Consequently, the petition is dismissed.
Penalties / Settlements / Directions
- Permission to file the Special Leave Petition was granted.
- The Special Leave Petition is dismissed.
- Any pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed of.
Corrective Actions & Future Obligations
- No further corrective measures or obligations were imposed beyond the disposal of pending applications.
Final Ruling & Enforcement
- The Supreme Court dismisses the Special Leave Petition and declines to interfere with the High Court’s decision.
- All procedural matters related to the petition are concluded.