Case Details

  • Case name: City and Industrial Development Corporation (CIDCO) vs. Sumit Subhash Sathe & Ors.
  • Court: Supreme Court of India, Bench of Justice Dipankar Datta and Justice Satish Chandra Sharma.
  • Petition numbers: Special Leave to Appeal (C) Nos. 19717‑19718/2026.
  • Related High Court judgments: Final judgment and order dated 25‑03‑2026 in WP No.1032/2026 and WP No.2650/2026, High Court of Judicature at Bombay.
  • Date of Supreme Court order: 03‑06‑2026.
  • Period of dispute: Not specified; pertains to interim relief granted by the High Court on 25‑03‑2026.

Parties Involved

  • Petitioner: City and Industrial Development Corporation (CIDCO), a statutory body of the Government of Maharashtra.
  • Respondents: Sumit Subhash Sathe and others (Ors.).
  • Counsel for petitioner: Mr. Ravi Prakash, Sr. Adv.; Mr. Samir Malik, AOR; Mr. Tushar Mathur, Adv.; Ms. Snehal Kaila, Adv.; Mr. Mahip Singh Sikarwar, Adv.; Mr. Yasharth Shukla, Adv.
  • Court officials: Assistant Registrar‑cum‑PS Court Master (NSH) Rashmi Dhyani Pant and Sudhir Kumar Sharma.

Issues / Allegations / Violations

  • CIDCO sought special leave to appeal against the High Court’s interim order granting relief in two writ petitions.
  • The petition challenged the validity of the High Court’s interim relief; specific substantive allegations are not detailed in the Supreme Court order.

Findings & Observations

  • The Supreme Court observed that the impugned interim order of the High Court does not warrant interference.
  • No substantive error or violation was identified in the High Court’s granting of interim relief.

Penalties / Settlements / Directions

  • The Supreme Court dismissed the special leave petitions, thereby upholding the High Court’s interim order.
  • No monetary penalties, settlements, or financial sanctions were imposed.

Corrective Actions & Future Obligations

  • The Court permitted CIDCO to raise any further points and contentions in a counter‑affidavit or during the final hearing of the writ petition before the High Court.
  • All pending applications, if any, were ordered to stand disposed.

Final Ruling & Enforcement

  • Special leave petitions (Nos. 19717‑19718/2026) are dismissed.
  • The High Court’s interim order remains effective.
  • The order is digitally signed by Rashmi Dhyani Pant on 03‑06‑2026 at 16:42:21 IST.