Case Details

  • Case Name: Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 21509/2026
  • Origin: Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 03-06-2026 in WA No. 2073/2025 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Madras
  • Court/Authority: Supreme Court of India (Partial Court Working Days Bench)
  • Order Date: 09-06-2026
  • Case/Order No.: Not specified in the order
  • Period of dispute: Not applicable

Parties Involved

  • Petitioner: P. KALYANASUNDARAVALLI
  • Respondents: INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LTD & ANR.
  • Petitioner’s Counsel: Senior Counsel Mr. Vinay Navare, Ms. Promila, Ms. Archana Goswami, Ms. Prerna, AOR Mr. S. Thananjayan
  • Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Atul S. Chandurkar

Issues / Allegations / Violations

  • Petition seeks Special Leave to Appeal against the High Court’s order dated 03-06-2026.
  • Central issue: Whether the Supreme Court should entertain the SLP when the High Court had already considered the respondents’ concession allowing the petitioner to invoke the contractual arbitration clause.

Findings & Observations

  • The Court observed that the High Court had already examined the concession regarding the contractual arbitration clause.
  • Consequently, the Court was not inclined to entertain the Special Leave Petition.

Penalties / Settlements / Directions

  • The petitioner may invoke the contractual arbitration clause within three months from the date of this order (i.e., by 09-09-2026).
  • The appointed arbitrator shall decide the arbitral dispute without being influenced by any observations made by the High Court (both Single Judge and Division Bench).
  • The petitioner is permitted to pray for interim relief before the arbitrator, if required.
  • Any pending applications, if any, are ordered disposed of.

Corrective Actions & Future Obligations

  • The petitioner must initiate arbitration within the stipulated three‑month period.
  • The arbitrator is required to adjudicate the dispute on its own merits, independent of the High Court’s prior observations.
  • No further court applications related to this matter shall remain pending; they are deemed disposed.

Final Ruling & Enforcement

  • The Special Leave Petition (SLP) is disposed of; the Supreme Court will not entertain it.
  • The petitioner is directed to proceed with arbitration as per the contractual clause within the specified timeframe.
  • All pending applications are closed, and the matter now proceeds to arbitration.