Case Details

  • Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (C) Nos.19366-19369/2023, arising from impugned final judgment and order dated 11‑05‑2023 in WP Nos.19570/2022, 19561/2022, 20119/2022, 20120/2022 passed by the High Court of Karnataka, Bengaluru.
  • Parties: Directorate General of Goods and Services Tax Intelligence (HQS) & Ors. (Petitioner) vs Gameskraft Technologies Private Limited & Ors. (Respondent).
  • Court: Supreme Court of India, Bench of Hon. Justices J.B. Pardiwala and R. Mahadevan.
  • Record Item No.1505, Court No.7 Section IV‑A; judgment pronounced on 27‑05‑2026.

Parties Involved

  • Petitioners: Directorate General of Goods and Services Tax Intelligence (HQS) and other unspecified parties.
  • Respondents: Gameskraft Technologies Private Limited and other unspecified parties.
  • Counsel for petitioners: senior advocates including Mr. Avi Singh, Sr. Adv., Mr. Vineet Bhatia, Adv., Mr. Devansh Srivastava, AOR, among many others listed in the record.
  • Counsel for respondents: senior advocates including Mr. E. C. Agrawala, AOR, Mr. V Sridharan, Sr. Adv., Mr. Sajan Poovayya, Sr. Adv., and others as detailed.
  • Intervenors and additional parties are enumerated in the proceedings.

Issues / Allegations / Violations

  • The petition challenges the Karnataka High Court’s judgment dated 11‑May‑2023; specific GST‑related issues or alleged violations are not detailed in the excerpt.

Findings & Observations

  • The Supreme Court bench granted special leave to appeal and issued a reportable judgment; no detailed legal reasoning or findings are provided in the supplied text.

Penalties / Settlements / Directions

  • No monetary penalties, settlements, or specific directions are mentioned in the record.

Corrective Actions & Future Obligations

  • Not specified in the document.

Final Ruling & Enforcement

  • Leave to appeal was granted.
  • The appeals, transferred cases, and writ petitions were allowed, disposed of, or dismissed as per the signed reportable judgment.
  • All applications for impleadment, intervention, and stays were disposed.
  • The reportable judgment was signed by Justice R. Mahadevan and placed on file by the Assistant Registrar.