Case Details

  • Case Name: Easy Handling LLC vs Pradaan Air Express Private Limited
  • Petition No.: Arbitration Petition No.1/2026
  • Court/Authority: Supreme Court of India, Civil Original Jurisdiction
  • Order Date: 26 May 2026
  • Relevant Dates: Aircraft Charter Agreement dated 08‑03‑2024; Termination Notice dated 19‑07‑2024; Arbitration Notice dated 18‑01‑2025

Parties Involved

  • Petitioner: Easy Handling LLC, a Georgia‑incorporated logistics support company.
  • Respondent: Pradaan Air Express Private Limited, Indian company registered under the Companies Act, 1956, providing chartered aircraft for cargo transport.
  • Arbitrators: Petitioner nominated Hon'ble Mr. Justice Jayant Nath (Former Judge, Delhi High Court); Court appointed Hon'ble Mr. Justice Chander Shekhar (Former Judge, Delhi High Court) as Respondent’s arbitrator.
  • Counsel for Petitioner: Mr. Vipul Wadhwa, Ms. Kashika Gera, Mr. Shreyash Choudhary, Ms. Kheyali Singh (AOR).
  • Counsel for Respondent: Not listed.

Issues / Allegations / Violations

  • Respondent was contractually obligated to operate 25 rotations per month (approximately 6 rotations per week) at USD 20,000 per rotation.
  • Petitioner alleges Respondent failed to provide the required rotations, constituting a breach of the Charter Agreement.
  • Petitioner issued a Termination Notice (19‑07‑2024) under Clause 16, demanding a refund of USD 103,398.65 (advance payment for unrendered services) and the return of a USD 50,000 security deposit.
  • No response was received from Respondent; consequently, Petitioner invoked arbitration on 18‑01‑2025 under Clause 21 and nominated an arbitrator.
  • Respondent neither nominated an arbitrator nor replied to the arbitration notice, prompting the filing of the arbitration petition before the Supreme Court.

Findings & Observations

  • The Court examined the petition filed under Section 11(6) read with Section 11(12)(a) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
  • Observed that Respondent’s failure to nominate an arbitrator justified the Court’s intervention to ensure the arbitration process proceeds.
  • Recognised the parties’ right to raise all contentions before the appointed Arbitral Tribunal.

Penalties / Settlements / Directions

  • The Court appointed Hon'ble Mr. Justice Chander Shekhar as the arbitrator on behalf of the Respondent.
  • Directed the two arbitrators (Petitioner’s nominee and the Court‑appointed nominee) to appoint a Presiding Arbitrator in accordance with Clause 21 of the Charter Agreement.
  • Designated New Delhi, India as the seat and venue of arbitration.
  • Empowered the Arbitral Tribunal to fix its own remuneration/fees.
  • Disposed of all pending interlocutory applications, if any.

Corrective Actions & Future Obligations

  • Parties are at liberty to raise all available contentions before the Arbitral Tribunal.
  • The Tribunal will determine its remuneration and conduct the arbitration as per the Charter Agreement and applicable law.

Final Ruling & Enforcement

  • The Arbitration Petition is allowed as per the signed order dated 26‑05‑2026.
  • Appointment of Justice Chander Shekhar as Respondent’s arbitrator and direction to appoint a Presiding Arbitrator are final orders.
  • All pending applications are disposed of.
  • Order signed by Chief Justice Surya Kant and Justice Joymalya Bagchi.