Authority: Supreme Court of India

Order Date: 28-07-2026

Case Overview

  • Petition: Special Leave Petition (C) No.23049/2025 filed by Edelweiss Asset Reconstruction Company Limited challenging the High Court of Bombay’s final judgment and order dated 27‑06‑2025 in IA No.2168/2024.
  • Respondents: Mohan Yeshwant Padawe and others (including owners and developers).
  • Court composition: Hon’ble Mr. Justice J.B. Pardiwala and Hon’ble Mr. Justice K. Vinod Chandran.
  • Counsel for petitioner: Senior Counsel Neeraj Kishan Kaul and team; counsel for respondents: various advocates listed.
  • The High Court’s order was examined for legal error.

Observations & Reasoning

  • The Supreme Court held that the High Court did not commit any error of law in its impugned order.
  • The Court directed that any grievance regarding recovery of the financed amount against the developers must be pursued in the appropriate forum as per law.
  • It noted that SARFAESI and Debt Recovery Tribunal (DRT) proceedings initiated by the petitioner will continue expeditiously on their merits.

Final Outcome

  • The Special Leave Petition stands disposed of.
  • All pending applications, if any, in the matter are also ordered to be disposed of.

Topics: Asset Reconstruction, Supreme Court Decision, Debt Recovery