Authority: Supreme Court of India
Order Date: 09 October 2026
Case Overview
- Parties: M/S Exotica Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd (Petitioner) vs. Anupama Anjali (Respondent).
- Petition Details: Contempt Petition (Civil) No.21 of 2026, linked to Civil Appeal No.138 of 2024.
- Background: An order dated 24 February 2026 recorded, based on a statement by Mr. Alok Sangwan, Senior Additional Advocate General for the State of Punjab, Haryana, that requisite payments had been made to the petitioner on 17 December 2025, and counsel was to obtain further instructions.
- Subsequent Development: Mr. Sangwan filed an affidavit confirming that the entire admissible payment was made on 17 December 2025, with an interest component of ₹2,00,000 paid subsequently. The petitioner's counsel also admitted receipt of these payments.
- Court Observation: Given the affidavit, acknowledgment by the petitioner's counsel, and the fact that the full payment (including interest) had been satisfied, the Court found no reason to continue the contempt proceedings.
- Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vikram Nath, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Mehta, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Aparesh Kumar Singh.
- Counsel for Petitioner: Mr. Yadav Narender Singh (AOR), Mr. Manu Prakash Upadhyay, Adv., Mr. Mayank Kumar Singh, Adv., Mr. Mudit Bansal, Adv., Mr. Girraj Singh Yadav, Adv.
- Counsel for Respondent: Mr. Alok Sangwan, Sr. A.A.G., Mr. Samar Vijay Singh (AOR), Mr. Sumit Kumar Sharma (AOR), Adv. Rajat Sangwan, Adv. Vaibhav Yadav, Adv. Harsh Mehla, Adv. Ms. Sabarni Som, Adv. Sahil Chaudhary, Adv. Manpreet Singh, Adv.
Final Outcome
- The notice is discharged and the petition is consigned to the record room.
- The contempt petition stands disposed of.
- Any pending applications, if any, are also ordered to stand disposed of.
- The signed order was placed on file by Assistant Registrar‑cum‑PS Sonia Bhasin and Assistant Registrar Ranjana Shailey.
Topics: Contempt Petition, Payment Settlement