Case Details

  • Case Name: Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 18192/2026
  • Petitioners: Future Consumer Limited
  • Respondents: Aussee Oats Milling Private Limited & ANR
  • Court/Authority: Supreme Court of India
  • Case/Order Numbers: SLP No. 18192/2026; Interlocutory Applications IA No. 157504/2026 (exemption from filing C/C of impugned judgment) and IA No. 160768/2026 (permission to file additional documents/facts/annexures)
  • Date of Order: 22‑05‑2026
  • Impugned Judgment Date: 08‑04‑2026 (High Court of Judicature at Bombay, CAP(L) No. 5890/2026)
  • Period of Dispute/Violation: Not applicable

Parties Involved

  • Petitioner: Future Consumer Limited (represented by counsel Mr. Darpan Wadhwa, Sr. Adv., Ms. Petrushka Dasgupta, Adv., Mr. Raghav Mittal, Adv., Mr. Mridul Yadav, Adv., Mr. Daksh Kadian, Adv., Ms. Pallavi Pratap, AOR)
  • Respondents: Aussee Oats Milling Private Limited & ANR (no counsel details provided)
  • Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Aradhe

Issues / Allegations / Violations

  • Petitioners sought exemption from filing a certified copy of the impugned High Court judgment (IA No. 157504/2026).
  • Petitioners also sought permission to file additional documents, facts, and annexures related to the case (IA No. 160768/2026).
  • The underlying dispute pertained to the High Court’s judgment dated 08‑04‑2026, which the petitioners aimed to challenge through a Special Leave Petition.

Findings & Observations

  • The Supreme Court observed that it was not inclined to interfere with the impugned judgment and order passed by the High Court.
  • No substantive examination of the merits of the High Court’s decision was undertaken; the Court focused on procedural propriety of the Special Leave Petition.

Penalties / Settlements / Directions

  • No monetary penalties, disgorgements, or settlements were imposed.
  • The Court issued a direct order dismissing the Special Leave Petition and disposing of any accompanying interlocutory applications.

Corrective Actions & Future Obligations

  • No specific corrective actions, compliance measures, or future reporting obligations were directed to either party.
  • The dismissal effectively upholds the High Court’s original order, leaving the parties to comply with that judgment.

Final Ruling & Enforcement

  • Final Decision: The Special Leave Petition (SLP No. 18192/2026) is dismissed.
  • Interlocutory Applications: All accompanying interlocutory applications, if any, stand disposed of.
  • Enforcement: The order is digitally signed by the Court Master (KAPIL TANDON) on 22‑05‑2026 at 17:41:24 IST, confirming its validity and enforceability.