Authority: High Court of Himachal Pradesh, Shimla
Order Date: 17 July 2026
Case Overview
- Petitioner: Shirar Resort & Spa; Respondents: Rajesh Agrawal and others.
- The petition was a contempt proceeding concerning an application under Clause 7.3 of an unspecified Scheme.
- The compliance affidavit indicated the Committee found the application ineligible due to absence of any budgetary allocation.
- Counsel for petitioner: Mr. Vivek Thakur; for respondents: Mr. Balram Sharma, Deputy Solicitor General of India, and others.
Final Outcome
- The Court ordered the contempt petition closed and disposed, discharging the notice.
- No further orders were required; the petitioner was granted liberty to seek any appropriate remedy under law.
- All pending applications, if any, were also disposed.
Topics: Legal Dispute, Hospitality Regulation
This content may not be financially relevant