Case Details

  • Case Name: M/s. Hymarque Constructions Private Limited vs Asiya Begum & Ors.
  • Petition Numbers: Special Leave Petition (C) No. 15992/2026; SLP(C) No. 16220/2026 (exemption from filing C/C of the impugned judgment).
  • Court/Authority: Supreme Court of India.
  • Date of Order: 29‑05‑2026.
  • Related Prior Order: Final judgment and order dated 17‑04‑2026 in CMA No. 60/2026 passed by the High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad.
  • Coram: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Aradhe.

Parties Involved

  • Petitioner: M/s. Hymarque Constructions Private Limited.
  • Respondent(s): Asiya Begum & Ors.
  • Counsel for Petitioner: Miss Shloka Narayanan (AOR Mr. N. Sai Kaushal), Mr. S Niranjan Reddy, Sr. Adv.; Mr. Krishna Dev Jagarlamudi (AOR Mr. Arpit Kumar Mishra), Adv.; Mr. Vishnu Kanth Mundada, Adv.; Mr. Shadab Azhar, Adv.; Mr. Aatif, Adv.; Mr. Shrey Nautiyal, Adv.
  • Counsel for Respondent(s): Mr. Dama Sheshadri Naidu, Sr. Adv.; Mr. Manoj C. Mishra (AOR Mr. Vishesh Jain), Adv.

Issues / Allegations / Violations

  • The specific issues, allegations, or violations underlying the Special Leave Petition are not detailed in the excerpt of the order.

Findings & Observations

  • The order does not provide substantive findings or observations on the merits of the case.

Penalties / Settlements / Directions

  • Direction 1: The matter is to be listed for further hearing on 16‑07‑2026.
  • Direction 2: Parties shall maintain status‑quo with respect to the suit‑schedule property until the Special Leave Petition is disposed of.
  • Direction 3: Parties are permitted to negotiate an amicable settlement in the interim.

Corrective Actions & Future Obligations

  • Both parties must ensure no alteration, transfer, or encumbrance of the suit‑schedule property pending the final disposal of the petition.
  • Parties are encouraged to engage in settlement discussions, which may resolve the dispute without further litigation.

Final Ruling & Enforcement

  • The Supreme Court issued the above directions on 29‑05‑2026, effectively postponing substantive adjudication until the next listed date and preserving the status‑quo on the contested property.
  • No monetary penalties or enforcement actions beyond the listed directions were imposed in this order.