Case Details

  • Case name: IDBI Trusteship Services Limited vs Surender Singh (suspended director of Vatika Limited) & Others
  • Civil Appeal No.: 7394/2026
  • Court: Supreme Court of India
  • Judges (Coram): Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pamidighantam, Sri Narasimha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Aradhe
  • Order date: 22-05-2026
  • Interim Applications: IA No.145351/2026 – permission to file additional documents/facts/annexures; IA No.145352/2026 – stay application (rejected)

Parties Involved

  • Appellant: IDBI Trusteship Services Limited
  • Respondents: Surender Singh (suspended director of Vatika Limited) and others (ORS.)
  • Counsel for Appellant: Senior Advocates Mukul Rohatgi, Gopal Jain, Meghna Mishra, Dheeraj P Deo (AOR), Nikhil Ratti Kapoor, Yashodhara Gupta, Kevin Chadha, among others
  • Counsel for Respondents: Senior Advocates Kapil Sibal, Virender Ganda, Satyajit A. Desai, Vishal Ganda, Ayandeb Mitra, Sachin Singh, Riya Palnitkar, Pratik Kumar Singh, Shashank Upadhyay, Parth Johri, Sanchit Agrahari, Madhur Duggal, Pulkit Goyal, Anagha S. Desai (AOR), Amit Sibal (Sr. Adv.), Manisha Singh, George Pothan Poothicote, Kanav Khatana, Jyoti Singh

Issues / Allegations / Violations

  • The order does not detail the substantive issues or allegations underlying the appeal. The parties are identified, but specific claims, alleged breaches, or statutory provisions are not enumerated in the excerpt.

Findings & Observations

  • The Supreme Court admits the appeal filed by IDBI Trusteship Services Limited.
  • The Court rejects the interim stay application (IA No.145352/2026) sought by the respondents.

Penalties / Settlements / Directions

  • No monetary penalties, settlements, or disgorgement orders are mentioned in the present order.

Corrective Actions & Future Obligations

  • The matter is posted for final hearing in the Regular List scheduled for September 2026. Parties are expected to appear before the Court on that date for further adjudication.

Final Ruling & Enforcement

  • Appeal admitted; stay application denied.
  • The case will proceed to a final hearing in September 2026, where the Court will consider the merits of the appeal and any further relief sought by the parties.