Summary of Key Information:

Reporting Period: Not Applicable (Tax matter)

Nature of Filing / Announcement: Disclosure under Regulation 30 of SEBI Listing Regulations regarding tax demands

IIFL Home Finance Limited (Material Subsidiary):

  • Received assessment order dated August 24, 2026 from Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle – 4(4), Mumbai
  • Tax demand raised under section 158BC(1)(c) of Income Tax Act, 1961
  • Assessment covers block period: April 1, 2018 to February 3, 2025
  • Total demand: ₹963.39 crore (including surcharge and cess)
  • Principal additions/disallowances include:
  • Overriding commission (ORC) income: approximately ₹490 crore
  • Deduction under section 36(1)(viii): approximately ₹305 crore
  • Interest strip assets: approximately ₹392 crore
  • ESOP expenses: approximately ₹53 crore

IIFL Finance Limited:

  • Received stay order dated August 5, 2026 on tax demand of ₹475.56 crore (originally disclosed May 12, 2026)
  • Stay granted until December 31, 2026 or disposal of appeal, whichever is earlier
  • Stay subject to payment of ₹23.78 crore (5% of disputed demand) in installments up to December 15, 2026
  • First installment of ₹5 crore paid on August 13, 2026
  • Company must comply with other conditions specified in the stay order

Company Position and Legal Grounds:

IIFL Home Finance Limited:

  • Believes it has substantial factual and legal grounds to contest additions/disallowances
  • ORC and interest strip assets income already offered to tax
  • Section 36(1)(viii) issue concerns interpretation of "general reserves" for statutory limits
  • ESOP expenses treatment contrary to legal position relied upon by company
  • Several matters examined in earlier scrutiny assessments
  • Pursuing appellate, rectification and other legal remedies
  • Does not expect material impact on financial position or operations

IIFL Finance Limited:

  • Has challenged assessment order before appellate authority
  • Matter remains pending adjudication
  • Company believes it has strong case on merits
  • No material impact on business operations from the order
  • Taking necessary steps to comply with stay order conditions