Case Details

  • Case: Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 19447/2026
  • Origin: Impugned final judgment and order dated 14‑May‑2026 in LPA No. 339/2026 of the High Court of Delhi
  • Court: Supreme Court of India
  • Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pamidighantam, Sr. Narasimha, Mr. Justice Aravind Kumar (Partial Court Working Days Bench)
  • Hearing Date: 01‑Jun‑2026
  • Order Date: 02‑Jun‑2026 (as per registrar signature)

Parties Involved

  • Petitioner: Indian Oil Corporation Ltd.
  • Respondents: Land and Development Officer (LDO) & others.
  • Counsel for Petitioner: Shailesh Madiyal, Sanyam Saxena, Vikash Chandra Shukla, Nubair Alvi, Rishabh Duggal, Vinnet Prasad, Siddharth Relan, Laksya S. Pandey, Isha Barshiliya, Shashwat Goel, Mala Narayan, Anjali Dhingra, Vishal Kr. Kaushik, Nishant Singg, Kushagra Bajpai, among others.
  • Counsel for Respondent: Anil Kaushik, A.S.G., Pranjal Singh, Anju Kaushik.

Issues / Allegations / Violations

  • The petitioner sought special leave to appeal the High Court's judgment dated 14‑May‑2026, challenging the order in LPA No. 339/2026.
  • The petition also included an interlocutory application seeking exemption from filing a copy/certificate of the impugned judgment.

Findings & Observations

  • The Court held that it was not inclined to interfere with the impugned order(s) under Article 136 of the Constitution of India.
  • No substantive examination of the merits of the High Court's judgment was undertaken.

Penalties / Settlements / Directions

  • The Special Leave Petitions were dismissed.
  • Any interlocutory application(s), if filed, were disposed of.

Corrective Actions & Future Obligations

  • No specific corrective measures or future compliance obligations were imposed on the parties.

Final Ruling & Enforcement

  • The order dismisses the petitions and disposes of interlocutory applications.
  • The order was signed by the Assistant Registrar, Jayant Kumar Arora, on 02‑Jun‑2026.