Authority: High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi

Order Date: 29 September 2026

Case Overview

  • Petitioners: Digambar Jain Terah Panthi Kothi, Madhuban, represented by Manager Rishab Kumar Jain (aged ~67), residing Isri Bazar, Giridih.
  • Opposite parties: (1) Shila Devi, wife of late Sukhdeo Prasad Sinha; (2) Santosh Kumar Sinha, son of late Sukhdeo Prasad Sinha; (3) Subhash Kumar Sinha, son; (4) Lalita Kumari, daughter; all residing Station Road, Isri Bazar, Giridih; (5) Jharkhand State Electricity Board (Jharkhand Urja Vikas Nigam Limited) represented by its Chairman, Ranchi.
  • The revision sought compliance with an earlier order dated 5 August 2026.
  • On 29 September 2026, no counsel appeared for the petitioner despite repeated calls; counsel for opposite party No. 5 was present.

Final Outcome

  • The Court dismissed Civil Revision No. 39 of 2026 for default, noting non‑compliance with the 5 August 2026 order.

Topics: Legal Proceedings, Court Order