Authority: High Court of Orissa at Cuttack
Order Date: 22nd June 2026
Case Overview
- Parties: Appellant – Kalinga Jute Products Pvt Ltd (Employer); Respondents – Smt. Sabita Rout (widow) and other family members of the deceased, Prasanta Kumar Rout.
- Nature of Proceeding: Appeal against the award of compensation under the Employees Compensation Act, 1923 (E.C. Act) in E.C. Case No.2 of 2021.
- Accident Details: The deceased, a Machine Operator‑cum‑Mechanic, died on 24‑01‑2021 while performing duties at the workplace.
- Initial Deposit: Employer deposited Rs 6,92,579 on 22‑02‑2021, calculating wage at Rs 348 per day (semi‑skilled rate).
- Dispute: Respondents claimed the deceased earned Rs 15,000 per month (Rs 500 per day) as a high‑skilled labourer; employer insisted on Rs 348 per day.
- Legal Framework:
- Section 4(1‑B) of the E.C. Act allows the Central Government to specify monthly wage by notification.
- Notifications: 31‑May‑2010 (Rs 8,000) and 03‑Jan‑2020 (Rs 15,000) prescribing monthly wage limits.
- Supreme Court in K. Sivaraman & Ors. v. P. Sathishkumar (2020) held that the 2009 amendment removed the deeming cap, requiring actual wages to be considered for compensation.
- Prior Court Orders:
- Order dated 04‑08‑2022 computed compensation at Rs 6,92,579, treating Rs 15,000 as the maximum wage limit.
- Review (RVWPET No.206 of 2022) led to recall of the 04‑08‑2022 order for erroneous interpretation of the wage ceiling.
- Evidence Presented:
- Claimants’ witnesses (widow, daughter, brother) testified the deceased earned Rs 500 per day.
- Employer’s witnesses (personal manager and supervisor) testified wage of Rs 308‑Rs 348 per day and that the employee was an apprentice/unskilled worker.
- No wage register was produced by the employer.
- National Trade Certificate and prior experience in machinery work supported claim of high‑skilled status.
- Minimum Wage Rates on Accident Date: Highly skilled – Rs 458.05/day; Skilled – Rs 398.05/day; Semi‑skilled – Rs 348.05/day; Unskilled – Rs 308.05/day.
- Court Reasoning:
- The actual monthly wage must be established by acceptable evidence; absent clear evidence, prescribed minimum rates apply.
- Given the deceased’s qualifications, experience, and consistent claimant testimony, the court accepted Rs 500 per day (Rs 15,000 per month) as the correct wage.
- The court affirmed the learned Commissioner’s award of Rs 11,48,175, noting the earlier error in treating Rs 15,000 as a statutory maximum.
Final Outcome
- The appeal is dismissed; the compensation award of Rs 11,48,175 is confirmed.
- The employer must pay the award, adjusted for the earlier deposit of Rs 6,92,579, to the respondents within two months of the judgment.
Topics: Employees Compensation Act, Wage Determination