Case Details

  • Case Name: Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 18094/2026 (arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 06‑04‑2026 in LPL No. 11964/2026 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay).
  • Court/Authority: Supreme Court of India.
  • Order/Case No.: Not specified.
  • Date of Hearing/Order: 26‑05‑2026 (hearing); order dated 29‑05‑2026 (digital signature).
  • Period of Dispute: Order dated 06‑04‑2026 (ex parte order of the High Court).

Parties Involved

  • Petitioner: Municipal Corporation of Panchkula, Haryana.
  • Respondent: Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited.
  • Counsel for Petitioner:
  • Additional Solicitor General (ASG) K.M. Nataraj (lead counsel).
  • A.S.G. Shekhar Raj Sharma.
  • A.A.G. Akshay Amritanshu.
  • AOR Ms. Nidhi Narwal.
  • Adv. Ms. Srishti Jain.
  • Adv. Mr. Sarthak Srivastava.
  • Counsel for Respondent: Not listed.
  • Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Alok Aradhe.
  • Court Master (SH) Assistant Registrar: Abhinav Kumar, Nidhi Wason.

Issues / Allegations / Violations

  • The petition sought revocation of the ex parte order dated 06‑04‑2026 passed by the High Court of Bombay.
  • The Additional Solicitor General requested withdrawal of the Special Leave Petition to instead pursue an interlocutory application for revocation of the same order.

Findings & Observations

  • The Supreme Court noted the petitioner's request to withdraw the Special Leave Petition.
  • The Court recognized that the impugned order was ex parte and that the petitioner intended to approach the High Court for revocation.

Penalties / Settlements / Directions

  • No monetary penalties or settlements were imposed.
  • The Court granted permission to withdraw the Special Leave Petition and dismissed it as withdrawn.
  • The Court directed the High Court to take up the interlocutory application for revocation and dispose of it expeditiously.
  • Any pending applications, if any, were ordered to stand disposed of.

Corrective Actions & Future Obligations

  • The petitioner (Municipal Corporation of Panchkula) must pursue the interlocutory application before the High Court for revocation of the ex parte order.
  • The High Court is obligated to consider the application promptly and issue a disposal order.

Final Ruling & Enforcement

  • The Special Leave Petition (C) No. 18094/2026 is dismissed as withdrawn.
  • Permission to withdraw was granted.
  • The High Court is instructed to expedite the revocation application and to dispose of any pending applications.
  • The order is digitally signed by Deepak Guglani on 2026‑05‑29 at 17:30:46 IST (signature not verified).