Authority: High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru
Order Date: 8 July 2026
Case Overview
- Petitioners: Sri Jayachandra Urs T.D., his wife Anuradha J. Urs, and M/s N.J. Stationary (represented by proprietor Sri Jayachandra Urs T.D.) filed Writ Petition No. 938 of 2024 under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution, challenging a possession notice dated 13‑12‑2023 issued by Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd.
- Respondents: Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd (Bengaluru branch and registered office in Mumbai) represented by authorized signatory Sri Chandrashekhar D. Patil.
- The petition alleged improprieties in the possession notice; the bank submitted that the notice had been withdrawn on 23‑12‑2025, rendering the petition moot.
- Counsel for petitioners (Sri Prakash M. Patil) and respondents (Sri Avinash B.C.) appeared before Justice Jyoti M.
Final Outcome
- The Court held that, in view of the bank’s withdrawal of the possession notice, no issue remained for consideration and therefore disposed of the writ petition.
- Any interim order previously granted stands discharged, and any pending interlocutory applications are also disposed of.
Topics: Banking, Legal Dispute