KSRTC Petition Dismissed by Supreme Court

Case Name: Divisional Controller KSRTC vs. Girish Acharya
Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s): 20911/2025
Court/Authority: Supreme Court of India
Case/Order No.: ITEM NO.55 COURT NO.16 SECTION IV-A
Date of Order: 25-05-2026
Originating Judgment: Impugned final judgment and order dated 25-11-2024 in MFA No. 9209/2018 passed by the High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru

Petitioner: Divisional Controller KSRTC (representing Karnataka State Road Transport Corporation)
Counsel for Petitioner: Mrs. T S Shanthi, Adv. Ms. Sneha Irine Kachhap, Adv. Mr. Amit J, Adv. Mr. P. Srinivasan (Advocate on Record)
Respondent: Girish Acharya
Counsel for Respondent: Ms. Kumud Lata Das (Advocate on Record), Mr. Ramesh Mahto, Adv. Mr. I.S. Minhas, Adv. Mr. Harsh Ajay Singh, Adv. Mr. Ravi Agrawal, Adv. Mr. Ashutosh Saini, Adv. Mr. Puneet (Advocates)
Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra, Hon'ble Mr. Justice N.V. Anjaria

The petition sought Special Leave to Appeal against the High Court's judgment (MFA No. 9209/2018) dated 25‑11‑2024.
Specific grounds of the petition are not detailed in the order; the filing was for permission to submit additional documents/facts/annexures (IA No. 168947/2025).

The Court, after hearing counsel, expressed that it was not inclined to entertain the Special Leave Petition.
No substantive discussion on the merits of the underlying dispute was provided.

The order does not prescribe any corrective measures or future compliance obligations for the parties.

Dismissal: The Special Leave Petition is dismissed.
Open Question of Law: Any question of law, if raised, is kept open for potential future consideration.
Pending Applications: All pending applications, if any, are ordered to stand disposed.
Court Master Signatures: Nisha Khulbey, Akshay Kumar Bhoria (Court Masters).

This order is limited to procedural dismissal; no further financial or operational implications are detailed.