Case Details

  • Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No.17050/2026 filed in the Supreme Court of India.
  • Originates from the impugned final judgment and order dated 17-02-2026 in WPL No.39398/2025 of the High Court of Judicature at Bombay.
  • Hearing date: 26-05-2026.
  • No specific period of violation or dispute is mentioned in the order.

Parties Involved

  • Petitioners: Geetadevi P Jadhav & Anr.
  • Respondents: M/s Kumar Agro Products Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.
  • Counsel for Petitioners: Senior Advocate Huzefa Ahmadi, Amol Chitale, Pragya Baghel, Prahlad Paranjapee, Rucha Vaidya, Yash Tembe, Aditya Sidhra, Yuvraj Kashyap, among others.
  • Counsel for Respondents: Senior Advocate Dr. Abhishek Manu Singhvi, Subhash Jadhav, Janay Jain, and a team of senior counsels including Mukul Rohatgi, Siddharth Dharmadhikari, Devanshi Singh, Samrat Krishnarao Shinde, Pratyush Kalro, Dama Seshadri Naidu, Ninad Dogra.
  • Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice J.B. Pardiwala and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vijay Bishnoi.

Issues / Allegations / Violations

  • The order does not detail the substantive issues; it pertains to the dispute arising from the Bombay High Court judgment that the petitioners are seeking to appeal.
  • No specific allegations or statutory violations are enumerated in the excerpt.

Findings & Observations

  • The Court observed that the parties should attempt mediation to resolve the dispute amicably.
  • Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sudhanshu Dhulia, former Judge of the Supreme Court, is appointed as the Mediator.

Penalties / Settlements / Directions

  • The Court directs that the fees of the Mediator and related modalities shall be worked out in consultation with the parties.
  • Parties are instructed to get in touch with the Mediator at the earliest.
  • The Registry is directed to inform the Mediator about this order promptly.
  • The matter is listed for further hearing on 28-07-2026 on the top of the Board.

Corrective Actions & Future Obligations

  • Both parties must engage with the appointed Mediator and agree on fee structures.
  • Compliance with the Court’s directive to contact the Mediator and attend the scheduled hearing is mandatory.

Final Ruling & Enforcement

  • The Supreme Court’s order mandates mediation as the preferred mode of dispute resolution for this case.
  • Enforcement includes the appointment of Justice Sudhanshu Dhulia as Mediator, fee determination, and a subsequent hearing date of 28 July 2026.
  • No further judicial orders are recorded in this excerpt.