Authority: Supreme Court of India

Order Date: 06-10-2026

Case Overview

  • Petitioner: M/s Lotus Green Constructions Pvt. Ltd.
  • Respondents: State of U.P. & Others.
  • Origin: Impugned final judgment and order dated 24-02-2025 in WRITC No. 15604/2021 of the Allahabad High Court.
  • Numerous Special Leave Petitions (SLP(C)) and Interim Applications (IA) were listed, including SLP(C) No. 6118/2025 and many others (see detailed list below).
  • Counsel for petitioner included senior advocates such as Mr. Abhishek Manu Singhvi, Mr. Anupam Lal Das, and many others.
  • Counsel for respondents included Solicitor General Mr. Tushar Mehta and a long roster of senior advocates.
  • The Bench hearing the matter comprised Hon'ble Mr. Justice M.M. Sundresh and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Prasanna B. Varale.

Categorisation of Matters

  • Category I (Item No. 48) – SLP(C) No. 6118/2025, Diary Nos. 60136/2025 and 59798/2025, plus sub‑items 48.1 to 48.20 covering various IA numbers (e.g., IA No. 239171/2026, IA No. 287199/2026, IA No. 284007/2025, etc.).
  • Category II (Item No. 59) – SLP(C) No. 6234/2025, SLP(C) No. 6436/2025, and sub‑items 59.1 (SLP(C) No. 9298/2025) and 59.2 (SLP(C) No. 23448/2025).
  • Category III (Item No. 60) – SLP(C) No. 10159/2025 and a series of sub‑items 48.4 to 48.18 covering SLP(C) Nos. 8543/2025, 3187/2026, 10594/2025, 13093/2025, 12904/2025, 12907/2025, 27824/2025, 36938‑36939/2025, 738/2026, 8930/2026, among others, plus several diary numbers and IA applications.
  • The Court directed that Category I be listed on 09‑12‑2026, Category II on 16‑12‑2026, and Category III on 20‑01‑2027.

Appointment of Nodal Counsel

  • Mr. Raj Kamal (learned AOR), Mr. Sughosh Subramanyam (learned counsel) and Mr. Kushagra Pandey (learned AOR) were appointed as the Nodal Counsel to coordinate and manage the multiple applications.

Final Outcome

  • The order is purely procedural: it appoints nodal counsel and orders the categorisation and scheduled listing of the numerous SLP and IA matters. No substantive adjudication on the merits of the petition was made.

Topics: Court Proceedings, Special Leave to Appeal, Procedural Order