Respondent: State of U.P. & Others, specifically the New Okhla Industrial Development Authority (NOIDA).
Home buyers' representative: Mr. S. Nagamuthu (learned senior counsel).
Intervenor: Mr. Devdatt Kamat (senior counsel for intervenor).
Respondent counsel: Solicitor General Mr. Tushar Mehta and team of advocates (Sameer Jain, Suvigya Awasthy, Himesh Thakur, Vivek Joshi, Deepesh Raj, Ved P. Singh, etc.).
Petitioner counsel: Sr. Adv. S. Niranjan Reddy, AOR Prithu Garg, and a large panel of advocates listed under Items 50, 52, and 54.
Issues / Allegations / Violations
Petitioners seek relief from the High Court’s order dated 24‑02‑2025, alleging procedural and substantive grievances.
Multiple Interim Applications (IA) were filed for:
Permission to file additional documents, facts, annexures.
Exemptions from filing other than (O.T.) documents.
Intervention and interpleader applications.
Core dispute revolves around the issuance of conditional Occupancy Certificates and the right of home buyers to take possession of the property.
Home buyers, represented by Mr. S. Nagamuthu, have not consented to the petitioner’s proposals.
NOIDA has issued a resolution containing 19 points based on the petitioner’s proposals, which the Court has taken on record.
The High Court’s direction for a CBI inquiry is noted but set aside for separate argument.
Findings & Observations
The Court records that conditional Occupancy Certificates have been issued and possession is being offered, but acknowledges the lack of consent from the home buyers.
The High Court’s impugned order is set aside in its entirety, except for the pending CBI inquiry direction which will be heard separately.
The Court notes that the intervention application IA No.160788/2026 is allowed despite opposition.
The statements of senior counsel for the intervenor (Mr. Devdatt Kamat) that they have not consented to the proposal are recorded.
The Court accepts the communication letters from NOIDA (Noida/Comm./2026/964 and Noida/Comm./2026/963 dated 22‑05‑2026) and annexes them as Annexure A, B, and C.
Penalties / Settlements / Directions
IA No.133232/2026 seeking appropriate orders/directions is disposed of.
NOIDA is directed to pass appropriate orders in accordance with the 19 resolution points annexed as Annexure B.
No monetary penalties are imposed; the focus is on procedural compliance and issuance of orders.
Corrective Actions & Future Obligations
NOIDA must implement the agreed‑upon terms contained in the 19 resolution points and issue the necessary orders.
The parties are to comply with the recorded statements regarding conditional Occupancy Certificates and possession.
The CBI inquiry direction issued by the High Court will be argued and heard separately at a later date.
Further hearing of the matter is scheduled for 30‑09‑2026 (as listed in the order).
Final Ruling & Enforcement
The Supreme Court sets aside the High Court’s order dated 24‑02‑2025.
IA No.133232/2026 is disposed; other IA applications for exemptions and additional documents are either permitted or noted.
Intervention application IA No.160788/2026 is allowed.
NOIDA is instructed to issue appropriate orders per the annexed resolution points.
The issue concerning the CBI inquiry will be argued separately.
The matter is listed for further hearing on 30‑09‑2026.
