This order is not relevant to stocks, companies, markets, or the economy. Below is a short summary of the judgement:
Case Details
- Case Name: MAA RAKTDANTIKA CONSTRUCTION vs. District Magistrate, Hamirpur & Ors.
- Court: Supreme Court of India
- Civil Appeal Numbers: 7936/2026 and 8040/2026
- Order Date: 23 May 2026 (order signed by Registrar)
- Hearing Date: 22 May 2026
Parties Involved
- Appellant: MAA RAKTDANTIKA CONSTRUCTION
- Respondents: District Magistrate, Hamirpur and other respondents
- Counsel for Appellant: Pinaki Mishra (Sr. Adv.), Sharad Chauhan (AOR), Utkarsh Sharma, Ashish Pandey, Jaya Singh, Sharmishtha Shukla, Narender Hooda (Sr. Adv.), Gaurav Agarwal, Anushrestha Pratap Singh, Shashank Singh (AOR)
- Counsel for Respondent: Not listed
Issues / Allegations / Violations
- The appellant sought admission of Interlocutory Applications (IA) for exemption from filing O.T. and a stay of proceedings. Specific substantive issues are not detailed in the excerpt.
Findings & Observations
- The Court, after hearing counsel, issued procedural directions. No substantive findings on merits are provided in the excerpt.
Penalties / Settlements / Directions
- Direction 1: Issue notice, returnable on 27 May 2026.
- Direction 2: Petitioner is permitted to serve notice on the standing counsel for the State.
Corrective Actions & Future Obligations
- The appellant must comply with the notice issuance and serve the required notice to the State’s standing counsel within the stipulated timeline.
Final Ruling & Enforcement
- The order is procedural, mandating issuance of notice and permitting service of notice on the State’s standing counsel. No further enforcement actions are detailed in the provided text.