Case Details

  • Case Name: Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No. 9725/2026
  • Parties: Mahanadi Coalfields Limited (Petitioner) vs. M/S BTFPL‑BLA (Respondent)
  • Court/Authority: Supreme Court of India
  • Order/Proceeding Date: 22‑05‑2026 (hearing); order issued on same date
  • Section Referenced: Item No. 40 Court No. 3 Section XI‑A
  • Period of Dispute: Not specified in the order

Parties Involved

  • Petitioner: Mahanadi Coalfields Limited, represented by counsel Mr. Vikramjit Banerjee (A.S.G.), Mr. Salvador Santosh Rebello (AOR), Mr. Prashant Rawat, Adv., Mr. Abhishek Singh, Adv., Ms. Moulishree Pathak, Adv.
  • Respondent: M/S BTFPL‑BLA, represented by Sr. Adv. Mr. Dr. Abhishek Manu Singhvi, Ms. Sadapurna Mukharjee, Adv., Mr. Mrigank Prabhakar, AOR
  • Bench: Hon’ble Mr. Justice J.K. Maheshwari and Hon’ble Mr. Justice Atul S. Chandurkar
  • Registrar: Deputy Registrar Court Master Gulshan Kumar Arora (signature not verified)

Issues / Allegations / Violations

  • Petitioners object only to Claim No. 3 of the arbitral tribunal’s award; no objections are raised against any other claims before the Arbitral Tribunal.
  • The petition seeks clarification on whether the petitioner must clear outstanding dues on the other claims pending the outcome of this Special Leave Petition.

Findings & Observations

  • The Court notes that the objection is limited to Claim No. 3 and that the petitioner has not contested the remaining claims.
  • The Court emphasizes that the pending dues on the other claims must be cleared, but such clearance will not prevent the petitioner from making further submissions on those issues.

Penalties / Settlements / Directions

  • The Court directs the petitioner to clear any outstanding dues on the other claims, subject to the final outcome of the Special Leave Petition.
  • No monetary penalty is imposed; the direction is procedural to ensure dues are settled.

Corrective Actions & Future Obligations

  • The petitioner must settle the dues related to the other claims before the arbitral tribunal, if not already done.
  • The petitioner remains free to continue submissions on the disputed issues despite the dues clearance requirement.

Final Ruling & Enforcement

  • The hearing on the objection to Claim No. 3 is postponed to the last week of July 2026.
  • The petitioner is required to clear outstanding dues on the other claims, with the clarification that such clearance will not debar further submissions.
  • The order is digitally signed by Deputy Registrar Gulshan Kumar Arora; the signature is noted as not verified.