Authority: Supreme Court of India
Order Date: 16 July 2026
Case Overview
- Parties: Maharashtra State Road Development Corporation (applicant) vs Plus BKSP Toll Limited (respondent).
- The matter stems from a miscellaneous application (Diary No. 37358/2026) arising out of the impugned final judgment and order dated 13‑04‑2026 in Civil Appeal No. 4455/2026.
- Hearing held on 15‑07‑2026 before Hon’ble Justices Aravind Kumar and Vipul M. Pancholi.
- Counsel for petitioner: Balbir Singh (Senior Advocate), Siddharth Dharmadhikari, Shrirang Varma (VP Legal Partners) – AOR.
- Counsel for respondent: Darius Khambata (Senior Advocate), Ritin Rai (Senior Advocate), Prithvi Sidhu, Diksha Rai, Atiga Singh, Purvat Wali, Aman Wasan, Kshitij Singh, Mridul Godha – AOR.
- The application sought relief under prayers 18A, 18B, 18C, and 18D. Prayer 18D was contested on the ground that the appellant had already deposited Rs 62 crore with the Bombay High Court Registry.
Final Outcome
1. Delay in filing was condoned.
2. Respondent’s senior counsel Darius Khambata raised no objection to prayers 18A‑18C; the Court allowed these prayers.
3. Applicant’s counsel submitted that prayer 18D would not survive because of the Rs 62 crore deposit; this submission was recorded.
4. The Court directed that all other directions issued in the order dated 13‑04‑2026 be complied with within one week from the date of this order.
5. All impleadment applications were rejected.
6. The miscellaneous application was disposed of, and any pending applications, if any, were also ordered to stand disposed.
Topics: Infrastructure, Legal Dispute