Case Details

  • Case Name: Special Leave Petition (Civil) Diary No(s). 24877/2026
  • Parties: Anil Keshaorao Gotmare (Petitioner) vs Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd. (Respondent)
  • Court/Authority: Supreme Court of India
  • Date of Hearing/Order: 22-05-2026 (order issued on same date)
  • Reference Orders Challenged: Final judgment and order dated 27-11-2020 in WP No. 7540/2019 and order dated 21-11-2025 in CAO No. 509/2024 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay at Nagpur

Parties Involved

  • Petitioner: Anil Keshaorao Gotmare
  • Counsel for Petitioner: Mr. Aaditya Aniruddha Pande (Advocate on Record), Mr. Sourav Singh (Advocate), Ms. Chitransha Singh Sikarwar (Advocate), Ms. Jagruti (Advocate)
  • Respondent: Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd.
  • Counsel for Respondent: Not listed in the record
  • Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manoj Misra, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Manmohan

Issues / Allegations / Violations

  • Petition sought condonation of delay in filing Interlocutory Applications (IA No. 145692/2026, IA No. 145694/2026, IA No. 153388/2026, IA No. 153390/2026, IA No. 155143/2026, IA No. 155144/2026, IA No. 152962/2026, IA No. 152965/2026, IA No. 154630/2026, IA No. 154631/2026) and exemption from filing copies of the impugned judgments.
  • The petitioner also challenged the impugned final judgment and order dated 27‑11‑2020 (WP No. 7540/2019) and the order dated 21‑11‑2025 (CAO No. 509/2024) of the High Court, seeking interference under Article 136 of the Constitution of India.

Findings & Observations

  • The Supreme Court observed that there was no sufficient ground to interfere with the impugned judgments of the High Court under its extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 136.

Penalties / Settlements / Directions

  • 1. Delay in filing the listed Interlocutory Applications was condoned.
  • 2. All Special Leave Petitions were dismissed.
  • 3. Any pending applications, if any, were ordered to stand disposed of.

Corrective Actions & Future Obligations

  • No specific corrective actions were mandated beyond the disposal of pending applications.

Final Ruling & Enforcement

  • The Supreme Court dismissed the Special Leave Petitions, declined to interfere with the High Court judgments, and ordered the disposal of any pending applications, thereby concluding the proceedings.