Counsel for Petitioners: Mr. Piyush Sharma (Advocate on Record), Mr. Anuj Kumar Sharma (Advocate).
Counsel for Respondents: Not specified in the record.
Issues / Allegations / Violations
Petitioners sought Special Leave to appeal the High Court’s order dated 18‑02‑2026, challenging its findings and seeking a refund of an amount allegedly payable by the respondents.
No specific statutory violations or detailed allegations were enumerated in the Supreme Court record.
Findings & Observations
The Court observed that there was no ground to interfere with the impugned order passed by the High Court.
The judgment underscores the High Court’s discretion and the lack of merit in the petitioners’ contentions.
Penalties / Settlements / Directions
The petitioners were granted liberty to approach the respondents directly for a refund of the amount in question.
The Special Leave Petitions were dismissed in their entirety.
The Court directed that any pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed of.
Corrective Actions & Future Obligations
Petitioners may file a separate claim or approach the respondents for the refund, as permitted by the Court’s liberty order.
No further compliance measures or corrective actions were imposed on either party by the Court.
Final Ruling & Enforcement
The Supreme Court dismissed the Special Leave Petitions, affirming the High Court’s order.
The order is final and enforceable; pending applications, if any, are to be considered disposed.