Case Details

  • Case name: Mebigo Labs Private Limited vs Google India Private Limited (Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No. 2583/2024)
  • Court: Supreme Court of India, Court No.6, Section XII
  • Related impugned judgment: O.S.A.(CAD) No. 105/2023 dated 19-01-2024
  • Order date: 26-05-2026
  • Period of violation/dispute: Not specified in the order

Parties Involved

  • Petitioner: Mebigo Labs Private Limited
  • Respondent(s): Google India Private Limited & ORS.
  • Counsel for Petitioner: Sajan Poovayya (Sr. Adv.), Vijayendra Pratap Singh (Adv.), Sayobani Basu (Adv.), Raghav Seth (Adv.), Chetan Chawla (Adv.), Abhijnan Jha (Adv.), Raksha Agrawal (AOR), Sindura N Swamy (Adv.), Palash Maheshwari (Adv.), Deeksha Manchanda (Adv.), Kushagra Jain (Adv.), Abir Roy (Adv.), T. Sundar Ramanathan (AOR), Devashish Marwah (Adv.), Vivek Pandey (Adv.), Aman Shankar (Adv.), Sasthibrata Panda (Adv.), Biyanka Bhatia (Adv.), Shreya Kapoor (Adv.), Sneha Sagar (Adv.), Lzafeer Ahmad B. F. (Adv.), Krishan Singhal (Adv.), Imtiaz Bantwal (Adv.), Vaibhav Choudhary (Adv.), R Venkatraman (Adv.), Sachin Menon (Adv.), Harinarayan Sk (Adv.), Monica Benjamin (Adv.), Ranjeev Khatana (Adv.), Shyam Gopal (Adv.), Karan Sachdev (Adv.), Hari Shankar (Adv.), Vinam Gupta (Adv.), Natasha K (Adv.), M. P. Devanath (AOR) and others.
  • Counsel for Respondent(s): Devashish Marwah (Adv.), Vinam Gupta (AOR), Abir Roy (Adv.), Aman Shankar (Adv.), Natasha K (Adv.), Saurabh Gupta (Adv.), Sajan Poovayya (Sr. Adv.), Vijayendra Pratap Singh (Adv.), Sayobani Basu (Adv.), Chetan Chawla (Adv.), Deeksha Manchanda (Adv.), Karan Singh Chandhiok (Adv.), Raksha Agarwal (Adv.), Abhijnan Jha (Adv.), Raksha Agrawal (AOR), Palash Maheshwari (Adv.), Sindura N Swamy (Adv.), Raghav Seth (Adv.), Kushagra Jain (Adv.), Lzafeer Ahmad B. F. (Adv.), Vivek Pandey (Adv.), Aman Shankar (Adv.), Sasthibrata Panda (Adv.), Biyanka Bhatia (Adv.), Shreya Kapoor (Adv.), Sneha Sagar (Adv.), M. P. Devanath (Adv.), T. Sundar Ramanathan (AOR) and others.

Issues / Allegations / Violations

  • The order does not disclose the substantive issues or allegations; it concerns procedural applications for exemption from filing copies of the impugned judgment.

Findings & Observations

  • No legal findings, observations, or reasoning are provided in this procedural order.

Penalties / Settlements / Directions

  • No monetary penalties or settlements are mentioned. The court granted exemptions from filing copies of the impugned judgment for numerous SLP applications listed (e.g., IA No.23638/2024, IA No.25773/2024, etc.).

Corrective Actions & Future Obligations

  • The court directed that the matters be listed for hearing on 01‑09‑2026.

Final Ruling & Enforcement

  • Order dated 26‑05‑2026, signed by Court Master Kapil Tandon, lists the cases for hearing on 01‑09‑2026. No further enforcement actions are specified.