Authority: Supreme Court of India, Chamber of Justice Arun Palli

Order Date: 14 Oct 2026

Case Overview

  • Parties: Mirador Constructions Pvt. Ltd (Appellant) vs. Aditya Daftary & Others (Respondents).
  • Application: IA No. 237358/2025 – Application for publishing the summons.
  • Hearing Date: 01 Oct 2026.
  • Counsel: For the appellant – Mr. Dilip Annasaheb Taur (Advocate on Record). For the respondents – M/S. Juris Corp. (Advocate on Record).
  • Nature of Proceeding: The appellant sought substituted service of summons on multiple respondents where personal service was not feasible, requesting publication in a national newspaper and a local newspaper with wide circulation as detailed in Paragraph‑5 of the application.

Order Details

1. The Court, having considered the reasons and the supporting affidavit, allowed the application.

2. The appellant is permitted to serve the following respondents by substituted service through publication in a national newspaper and a local newspaper with wide circulation: respondents numbered 7, 10, 16, 17, 24, 28, 32, 40, 47, 50, 58, 67, 68 and 70.

3. Counsel for the appellant is directed to take the requisite measures and file proof of service within four weeks from the date of this order.

Final Outcome

  • The Supreme Court granted the request for substituted service, enabling Mirador Constructions to serve summons on the listed respondents via newspaper publication and mandating proof of service to be submitted within a four‑week timeframe.

Topics: Court Service, Substituted Service, Civil Procedure