Supreme Court dismissed Nagreeka's appeal regarding interpretation of arbitration clause in commercial contract with Cargocare Logistics.
Court ruled word 'can' in clause indicates optional arbitration, requiring fresh mutual consent for dispute referral.
Dispute arose from Cargocare's delivery of goods without original bill of lading, causing USD 28,064.86 loss to Nagreeka.
Judgment clarifies contractual interpretation principles and maintains party autonomy as cornerstone of arbitration agreements.