Authority: Supreme Court of India

Order Date: 18 September 2026

Case Overview

  • Parties: Petitioners Narmada & Ors. vs Respondent Kalpana.
  • Original Suit: Filed for possession, permanent injunction, and mesne profits. Trial Court judgment dated 16‑Nov‑2024 granted possession and injunction but denied mesne profits.
  • Review Petition: Dismissed by the Trial Court on 22‑Aug‑2025.
  • First Appeal: Presented before the Delhi High Court; dismissed on 27‑Mar‑2026 (RFA No. 287/2026) on the ground of an 81‑day delay.
  • Delay Explanation: Appellants argued the delay resulted from pursuing the Review Petition; the High Court did not accept this explanation.
  • Representation: No counsel appeared for the respondent. Petitioners were represented by Ms. Deepika Mishra, AOR Mr. Diwakar Awasthi, Adv. Mr. Krishna Mohan B., and Adv. Ms. Aakriti Arora.

Final Outcome

  • The Supreme Court granted special leave (SLP No. 23757/2026) and set aside the High Court order.
  • It held that sufficient cause existed to condone the 81‑day delay and restored the first appeal to its original number.
  • The First Appellate Court is directed to issue notice to the defendant(s) and to hear the parties solely on the issue of mesne profits.
  • The appeal is allowed, and any pending interlocutory applications, if any, are disposed of.

Topics: Property Law, Civil Procedure