Authority: National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Principal Bench, New Delhi
Order Date: 17 August 2026
Case Overview
The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) heard Comp. App. (AT) (Ins) No. 829 of 2026 along with I.A. No. 3258 of 2026. The appeal involves Subhash Ganpatrao Buty HUF (through its Karta, Subhash Ganpatrao Buty) as the Appellant versus Pankaj Bhattad (Resolution Professional of Gigeo Construction Company Pvt. Ltd.) and Another as Respondents. The order deals with procedural scheduling matters for filing replies and rejoinders in the ongoing insolvency appeal.
Final Outcome
The Tribunal granted Respondent No. 2 exactly ten days to file their reply with a clear stipulation that no further time extensions would be granted. Respondent No. 1 was permitted to bring on record the hard copy of their already filed online reply within one week. The Appellant was directed to file a rejoinder to Respondent No. 1's reply within one week. The matter was adjourned and listed for hearing on 09 September 2026.
Topics: Insolvency Appeal, Procedural Hearing, NCLAT