Case Details
This order from the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) Principal Bench, New Delhi, pertains to a cluster of eight interconnected Company Appeals (AT) (Insolvency) cases. The case numbers are 129, 130, 131, 133, 135, 136, 162, and 179 of 2026, each with corresponding Interlocutory Applications (I.A.). The order was passed on May 22, 2026, in hybrid mode. The final hearing was adjourned and the matters are now listed for July 6, 2026.
Parties Involved
Appellants:
- Comp. App. (AT) (Ins) No. 129 of 2026: Jitesh Nair
- Comp. App. (AT) (Ins) No. 130 of 2026: Rohit Rajanikant Naik
- Comp. App. (AT) (Ins) No. 131 of 2026: Ritesh Shantibhai Waghela
- Comp. App. (AT) (Ins) No. 133 of 2026: Manasi Abhijit Pawaskar
- Comp. App. (AT) (Ins) No. 135 of 2026: Prabhakar Tulshiiram Galande
- Comp. App. (AT) (Ins) No. 136 of 2026: Prasad Pandurang Rikame
- Comp. App. (AT) (Ins) No. 162 of 2026: Capacite Infraprojects Ltd
- Comp. App. (AT) (Ins) No. 179 of 2026: Capacite Infraprojects Ltd
Respondents:
The common respondent across all appeals is Jayesh Sanghrajka, who is identified as the Resolution Professional for Radius & Deserve Builders LLP. The other respondents are denoted as 'Ors.' (Others).
Legal Representation:
- For the individual appellants (Jitesh Nair, Rohit Naik, Ritesh Waghela, Manasi Pawaskar, Prabhakar Galande, Prasad Rikame) and Capacite Infraprojects Ltd: Advocates Ms. Neeha Nagpal and Mr. Ishit Patel; for Capacite, also Mr. Rahul Chitris, Mr. Abhay Singh, Ms. Shwetal Shepal, Mr. Jishnu Adhikari, and Ms. Ankit Agarwal.
- For Respondent-1 (Jayesh Sanghrajka): Advocates Mr. Amir Arsiwala and Ms. Neha Arya.
- For Respondent-2: Advocates Ms. Riddhi Sancheti, Mr. Anurag Anand, and Mr. Mukul Kulhari.
Final Ruling & Enforcement
The Bench, comprising Justice Mohammad Faiz Alam Khan (Member - Judicial) and Naresh Salecha (Member - Technical), passed a procedural order. The order states "No time left" and accordingly, all the listed appeals were adjourned. The next date of hearing is fixed for 06.07.2026. No substantive rulings on the merits of the appeals were issued in this order.