Authority: High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh
Order Date: 07 August 2026
Case Overview
- Parties: Petitioners – Vasant Hurmade and others; Respondents – NHPC Ltd and others.
- Petition Number: CWP No. 22923‑2026 (O&M).
- Legal Basis: Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.
- Reliefs Sought:
- Prayer A: Writ of Certiorari against the amended Clause 6.2 of NHPC’s Promotion Policy dated 14‑02‑2025, alleging arbitrary discretion by the CMD in bifurcating the Executive Director (Grade E9) post without a prescribed engineering‑discipline ratio.
- Prayer B: Writ of Certiorari against a circular dated 20‑07‑2026, contending that petitioners were not shortlisted for interviews for the Executive Director post while their juniors were.
- Prayer C: Writ of Mandamus directing the Board to lay down an appropriate discipline‑ratio for the Executive Director post.
- Counsel: Petitioners – Mr. Sreenath A. Khemka (Advocate); Respondents – Mr. Satyapal Jain, Addl. Solicitor General, assisted by Mr. Sukhandeep Singh (Advocate for NHPC), Ms. Archana Vashishth (Advocate for respondent No. 3), and Mr. Gaurav Pathak (Advocate for respondent No. 3).
- Bench: Hon’ble Mrs. Justice Sudepti Sharma.
Court Findings & Reasoning
- The Court observed that the petition concerning prayer B (interview short‑listing) had become infructuous and therefore dismissed it.
- The petitioners sought to file a fresh writ for prayers A and C; however, the Court dismissed the present petition as withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh petition, effectively rejecting the current reliefs.
- No substantive examination of the merits of Clause 6.2 or the circular was undertaken, as the petition was dismissed on procedural grounds.
Final Outcome
- The writ petition is dismissed in its entirety: prayer B dismissed as infructuous; prayers A and C dismissed as withdrawn.
- All pending applications, if any, are also disposed of.
- No further directions or orders were issued against NHPC Ltd.
Topics: Promotion Policy, Court Decision