Case Name: Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s).17989/2026
Court/Authority: Supreme Court of India
Order/Decision No.: Not specified (order dated 26‑05‑2026)
Date of Order: 26‑05‑2026
Underlying Dispute: Impugned final judgment and order dated 11‑02‑2026 in WP No. 1612/2024 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay
Parties Involved
Petitioner: Okhawa Shelter, Builders and Developers
Respondent(s): Mumbai Municipal Corporation & Ors.
Petitioner’s Counsel: Mr. Chander Uday Singh (Sr. Adv.), Mr. Ram Ugrah Singh (Adv.), Mr. Ashish Raghuvanshi (Adv.), Ms. C. Ankeeta Appanna (AOR), Ms. Madhura Chitnis (Adv.), Mr. Ishit Mahajan (Adv.), Ms. Bidya Mohanty (Adv.), Ms. Katyayani Suhrud (Adv.), Mr. Abhishek Kalaiyarasan (Adv.)
Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice J.B. Pardiwala, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Vijay Bishnoi
Court Master (SH): Harpreet Kaur
Court Master (NSH): Pooja Sharma
Issues / Allegations / Violations
The petition sought Special Leave to appeal against the High Court’s final judgment and order dated 11‑02‑2026 in WP No. 1612/2024.
No specific factual allegations or statutory violations were detailed in the order.
Findings & Observations
The Supreme Court, after hearing counsel and reviewing the material on record, concluded that there was no good ground to interfere with the impugned order passed by the High Court.
The Court did not elaborate further on legal reasoning or precedents.
Penalties / Settlements / Directions
No monetary penalties, settlements, or sanctions were imposed.
The Special Leave Petition was dismissed.
Corrective Actions & Future Obligations
The Court directed that any pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed of.
No additional compliance measures or future obligations were stipulated.
Final Ruling & Enforcement
Outcome: Special Leave Petition dismissed.
Enforcement: The dismissal is effective immediately; pending applications are to be considered disposed of.
Implication: The High Court’s original judgment and order dated 11‑02‑2026 remain in force.
